Skip to main content

Week Two: McCloud Sets Us Straight on Comics

By Anonymous

Everyone knows what comics are. Well, it turns out their definition is pretty complicated. McCloud’s book makes understanding even that easier by connecting the technical aspects of creating and reading a comic to how they work on the reader’s subconscious. He settles on a definition of comics as sequential visual art. Breaking this down means, of course, art in an order. Images are sequenced in space to tell a story or events and create reader responses. Pictures are not arbitrary in their arrangement, but deliberately sequenced in side-by-side panes on a page (McCloud 8-9). Sometimes words are not even required if events can be clearly followed just from illustrations. Although at first these abstract concepts seem complicated, his tying them to the principles of order and placement in this way make them more digestible.

Knowing the vocabulary of comics lets you peek inside their construction and deconstruction. For instance, Understanding Comics explains that comics are built out of icons, or images, that symbolize a real person, place, thing, or idea. Often, this iconography presents the world in a simplified way to create a gut reaction. Letters and words are completely abstract icons with no physical resemblance to their ideas, but pictures can have different levels of abstraction. What happens when artists simplify a real picture of a face to just an oval with two dots and a line? McCloud argues that its essence is still universally recognizable as a face and its meaning intensified (36). Amplifying the message is also done through the interaction of words and pictures that do not jostle for power. Learning how the mind works in recognizing the meaning of images, no matter how abstract, helps to understand why readers react so powerfully to pictures. 
  
McCloud explains that you are self-aware even when looking at or speaking to another person. But this mind-picture is sketchy. So when you look at a simplified icon or cartoon, you enter that imaginary world and see yourself. This happens when you become extensions of inanimate objects like your car. Or transformed by clothes (38-39). Comics can pull people’s awareness. Just how much depends on the amount of abstraction or realism. For instance, a minimally drawn sword might show a stronger connection to the iconic character holding it. Simplified characters combined with realistic backgrounds can also increase viewer identification with them. Sometimes, they are drawn with more realism to stress otherness from readers (44). So they see, rather than become, other characters or objects. This explains why readers are either drawn in completely or remain apart from characters and stories.

This book has helped me really see the complexity of the art form. It has changed my preconceived ideas of comics as being childish. For instance, Spiegelman’s graphic novel MAUS is not simply a cartoon. The chapter page shown here illustrates McCloud’s principles of the masking effect, viewer identification, and visual iconography (see Fig. 1). The mouse heads are blank masks taken down to universal basics. Such little detail depersonalizes the characters, demanding people become more perceptive and focus on what is being said and done. Rather than promoting otherness, readers project onto the mice and become part of the story. Though MAUS is a far cry from my happy memories of Calvin and Hobbes, Understanding Comics helps me understand its important message.


http://jcpmaus.blogspot.com/2011/03/chapter-5-mouse-holes.html

Fig. 1. Mouse Holes from “MAUS and GENOCIDE: Chapter 5: ‘Mouse Holes,” The Complete
MAUS, 16 Mar. 2012, http://jcpmaus.blogspot.com/2011/03/chapter-5-mouse-holes.html.


Works Cited

 McCloud, Scott. Understanding Comics: The Invisible Art. William Morrow,
HarperCollins Publishers, 1994, pp. 8-9, 36, 38-39, 44.

Spiegelman, Art. “MAUS and GENOCIDE: Chapter 5: ‘Mouse Holes.’” The Complete MAUS,
16 Mar. 2012, http://jcpmaus.blogspot.com/2011/03/chapter-5-mouse-holes.html.



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Iconic Abstraction and the Vocabulary of Comics in Hellboy

By Anonymous
In Chapter 2 of Understanding Comics , McCloud talks about two key concepts I’d like to discuss: he identifies reality , language , and the picture plane as a representation of the pictorial vocabulary of comics, and he expresses a scale for iconic abstraction of comic art. As readers following the action in comics, we are guided by what objects and events cartoonists decide demand focus in each individual moment or panel. This focus via simplification of reality - referred to as abstraction - provides a rhythm of reading the visual representation of a sequence of events, controlling the timing of action and dialogue through spacing of panels and objects on a page. McCloud makes it clear that abstraction in comics is really just about the representation of ideas . Conceptually, we can perceive a specific drawn event, such as an explosion or a fight, without that event being pictured exactly or photorealistically. Rubble or glass flying midair can represent the impact of fights depi...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sketching Reality in Art Spiegelman's Maus

By Anonymous
It's no secret that novels often blur the line between reality and fiction. Whether influenced by an author's experiences or drawn from them wholesale, all forms of artwork will always carry a piece of their artist. This is no less true for graphic novels, a medium often stereotyped by traditional capes-and-crusaders-style storytelling. Whether or not this stigma is deserved is an argument for another day, but for now we will venture into a lesser-known genre not typically associated with the great literature classics: the non-fiction graphic novel. You may ask yourself if this is a misnomer. By their very definitions, non-fiction and novels are considered their own distinct categories. A novel, per tradition, is considered inherently fictitious, and regardless of whether or not you think fiction and non-fiction should be regarded on the same level, I will circle back around to my initial argument that art will always be influenced by the experiences of its author, and th...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Two Faces of Anarchy in V for Vendetta

By Anonymous
As someone who has only seen the movie version of V for Vendetta once many years ago and have never read the graphic novel, I wasn’t exactly sure how similar or different the movie version would be to the graphic novel. I was in for a surprise when I discovered just how vastly different, they are from each other. With that being said, they do have some similarities when strictly looking at the motives of the characters. Let’s dive into those motives and how the author and illustrator of V for Vendetta achieved getting these motives across to their readers. In Scott McCloud’s chapter of Understanding Comics “ Blood in the Gutter ” we are presented with different panel – to – panel transitions, and an introduction to the term “gutter” as being the white space between the panels which is where the audience of reader “takes two separate images and transforms them into a single idea” (McCloud, 66). After finishing reading V for Vendetta , several themes or ideas that were most prevalent...
Post a Comment
Read more