Skip to main content

Understanding Comics with the Justice League

     In Scott McCloud’s Understanding The Invisible Art of Comics, readers are introduced to vocabulary that is associated only in comics. On page nine, he even stated his definition of comics that are “juxtaposed pictorial and their images in deliberate sequence, intended to convey information and/or to produce an aesthetic response from the reader” (McCloud).  In the definition, there is the word “sequence” which could mean anything, but in comics and graphic novels, it is meant to be with the term “visual sequential art”. According to Mike Eisner, “the pictures…when part of a sequence, even a sequence of only two, the art of the image is transformed into something more: The Art of Comics!” (McCloud 5). To put into an example, if someone was to just put one panel of a superhero, some would think that it is just a picture. But once it is combined with another panel with either the same hero or a villain, it becomes to what we know as a comic! While the self-made definition does seem long and could be put with anything such as superheroes, as shown through the example before the definition, it is rather simple to understand with what McCloud talks about in chapter two. In Chapter two, McCloud talks about icons which are defined by “to mean any image used to represent a person, place, thing or idea” (27). He goes further into detail about how readers pay attention more into cartoon rather than one with realistic as readers would put themselves into the “empty shell” and “become it” rather than “observe the cartoon” (McCloud 36). Therefore, when young children read comics or graphic novels, they put themselves into the story and imagine them as if they were the main character or the main superhero. I remember that I used to do that when I would read hero comics like Spiderman or the Justice League and would imagine that I had powers like Wonder Woman or Batman. 
     I would read graphic novels like the Justice League and other superheroes. From reading the first two chapters of Understanding The invisible Art of Comics, it helped me understand comics and graphic novels more. From the first chapter, I understood more about how the art of comics was made and the thought process of the artists and author of the storyline. With the Justice League graphic novels, the artists and authors would have to coordinate with each other to come out with a comic that would have a good storyline as well as having good art that corresponds with the story. When I first thought about graphic novels, I would think that it was just pictures but not after reading the first chapter, I realize that it is more. Same with the chapter two information, I understand more about icons and why children decide to put themselves into the graphic novels as the character itself rather than just thinking about “what if…”. Another thing that was mention in chapter two that helped me understand comics more is about realism in comics. When McCloud mentions that readers rather focus more on cartoonish style rather than those that are drawn more in realistic style. I think it is strange as I read the Justice League graphic novel as it was drawn more in a realistic style than cartoonish. Although I do understand why I didn’t lose focus when reading the Justice League as it mention in chapter two. I would put myself into a shell of a character and thought and imagined that I was the hero with the powers to save the world. Especially with how the Justice League were many children idols when the graphic novels were popular.


JUSTICE LEAGUE THEIR GREATEST TRIUMPHS GRAPHIC NOVEL

Source: DC Comics. JUSTICE LEAGUE THEIR GREATEST TRIUMPHS GRAPHIC NOVEL. N.d. https://www.reedcomics.com/justice-league-their-greatest-triumphs-graphic-novel





Work Cited

McCloud, Scott. Understanding Comics: The Invisible Art. Harper Collings Publishers, 1993.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Two Faces of Anarchy in V for Vendetta

As someone who has only seen the movie version of V for Vendetta once many years ago and have never read the graphic novel, I wasn’t exactly sure how similar or different the movie version would be to the graphic novel. I was in for a surprise when I discovered just how vastly different, they are from each other. With that being said, they do have some similarities when strictly looking at the motives of the characters. Let’s dive into those motives and how the author and illustrator of V for Vendetta achieved getting these motives across to their readers. In Scott McCloud’s chapter of Understanding Comics “ Blood in the Gutter ” we are presented with different panel – to – panel transitions, and an introduction to the term “gutter” as being the white space between the panels which is where the audience of reader “takes two separate images and transforms them into a single idea” (McCloud, 66). After finishing reading V for Vendetta , several themes or ideas that were most prevalent...

Iconic Abstraction and the Vocabulary of Comics in Hellboy

In Chapter 2 of Understanding Comics , McCloud talks about two key concepts I’d like to discuss: he identifies reality , language , and the picture plane as a representation of the pictorial vocabulary of comics, and he expresses a scale for iconic abstraction of comic art. As readers following the action in comics, we are guided by what objects and events cartoonists decide demand focus in each individual moment or panel. This focus via simplification of reality - referred to as abstraction - provides a rhythm of reading the visual representation of a sequence of events, controlling the timing of action and dialogue through spacing of panels and objects on a page. McCloud makes it clear that abstraction in comics is really just about the representation of ideas . Conceptually, we can perceive a specific drawn event, such as an explosion or a fight, without that event being pictured exactly or photorealistically. Rubble or glass flying midair can represent the impact of fights depi...

Sketching Reality in Art Spiegelman's Maus

It's no secret that novels often blur the line between reality and fiction. Whether influenced by an author's experiences or drawn from them wholesale, all forms of artwork will always carry a piece of their artist. This is no less true for graphic novels, a medium often stereotyped by traditional capes-and-crusaders-style storytelling. Whether or not this stigma is deserved is an argument for another day, but for now we will venture into a lesser-known genre not typically associated with the great literature classics: the non-fiction graphic novel. You may ask yourself if this is a misnomer. By their very definitions, non-fiction and novels are considered their own distinct categories. A novel, per tradition, is considered inherently fictitious, and regardless of whether or not you think fiction and non-fiction should be regarded on the same level, I will circle back around to my initial argument that art will always be influenced by the experiences of its author, and th...