Skip to main content

Understanding Comics with the Justice League

     In Scott McCloud’s Understanding The Invisible Art of Comics, readers are introduced to vocabulary that is associated only in comics. On page nine, he even stated his definition of comics that are “juxtaposed pictorial and their images in deliberate sequence, intended to convey information and/or to produce an aesthetic response from the reader” (McCloud).  In the definition, there is the word “sequence” which could mean anything, but in comics and graphic novels, it is meant to be with the term “visual sequential art”. According to Mike Eisner, “the pictures…when part of a sequence, even a sequence of only two, the art of the image is transformed into something more: The Art of Comics!” (McCloud 5). To put into an example, if someone was to just put one panel of a superhero, some would think that it is just a picture. But once it is combined with another panel with either the same hero or a villain, it becomes to what we know as a comic! While the self-made definition does seem long and could be put with anything such as superheroes, as shown through the example before the definition, it is rather simple to understand with what McCloud talks about in chapter two. In Chapter two, McCloud talks about icons which are defined by “to mean any image used to represent a person, place, thing or idea” (27). He goes further into detail about how readers pay attention more into cartoon rather than one with realistic as readers would put themselves into the “empty shell” and “become it” rather than “observe the cartoon” (McCloud 36). Therefore, when young children read comics or graphic novels, they put themselves into the story and imagine them as if they were the main character or the main superhero. I remember that I used to do that when I would read hero comics like Spiderman or the Justice League and would imagine that I had powers like Wonder Woman or Batman. 
     I would read graphic novels like the Justice League and other superheroes. From reading the first two chapters of Understanding The invisible Art of Comics, it helped me understand comics and graphic novels more. From the first chapter, I understood more about how the art of comics was made and the thought process of the artists and author of the storyline. With the Justice League graphic novels, the artists and authors would have to coordinate with each other to come out with a comic that would have a good storyline as well as having good art that corresponds with the story. When I first thought about graphic novels, I would think that it was just pictures but not after reading the first chapter, I realize that it is more. Same with the chapter two information, I understand more about icons and why children decide to put themselves into the graphic novels as the character itself rather than just thinking about “what if…”. Another thing that was mention in chapter two that helped me understand comics more is about realism in comics. When McCloud mentions that readers rather focus more on cartoonish style rather than those that are drawn more in realistic style. I think it is strange as I read the Justice League graphic novel as it was drawn more in a realistic style than cartoonish. Although I do understand why I didn’t lose focus when reading the Justice League as it mention in chapter two. I would put myself into a shell of a character and thought and imagined that I was the hero with the powers to save the world. Especially with how the Justice League were many children idols when the graphic novels were popular.


JUSTICE LEAGUE THEIR GREATEST TRIUMPHS GRAPHIC NOVEL

Source: DC Comics. JUSTICE LEAGUE THEIR GREATEST TRIUMPHS GRAPHIC NOVEL. N.d. https://www.reedcomics.com/justice-league-their-greatest-triumphs-graphic-novel





Work Cited

McCloud, Scott. Understanding Comics: The Invisible Art. Harper Collings Publishers, 1993.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Analysis of Aya: Life in Yop City

To begin this week's post, I'd like to first address a few things about the author's duty to his/her readers. When we think of reading material from other countries or cultures, what factors are important to us? What information do we need in order to recognize the significance of the author's work? For me, it's important for the author to find some way to connect to me as a reader. Do we share a common experience? Can I relate your story to mine? This is not to say that a writer's work is rendered unimpressive if they choose not to do this. But I do think it goes without saying that most impressionable works hit us emotionally. I also think that an author should be conscious of the world that they are painting for the reader. Is it true what you're writing? Does it provide some sort of insight into the world as you see it? Are you confirming outside opinions of your culture, or are you breaking the stereotypes that have been placed upon you? That being sai...

Junji Ito and the Art of the Uncanny

As discussed in Chapter 2 of Scott McCloud's Understanding Comics , the Japanese style of comic book art holds several notable quirks. While early manga artists tended to favor simplistic, yet distinct styles that paved the way for a number of internationally renowned characters, contemporary manga artists have since favored a hybrid style that juxtaposes the cutesy, rounded characters of yesteryear with the realistic and richly shaded settings that have since become popular. Building on this, McCloud describes a phenomenon in which Japanese comic artists have used realism to objectify--that is, to emphasize the "otherness" of certain characters, objects, or places--elements of their work and further separate these elements from the reader. I have chosen the work of one of my favorite comic artists, Japanese horror icon Junji Ito, to further illustrate McCloud's point. Though McCloud describes this phenomenon in the context of Japanese comic book art, he is usi...

Bringing Africa into the Fold

The comic Aya: Life in Yop City does a fantastic job of illustrating a culture different from the more popular Western variety. For those reading this, have you ever considered Africa in any way that was not influenced by main stream media? No? Well me either. It is sad to say, but my view of Africa was just - more or less - a vast land of chaos and poverty. Why? Because is that not what the media would have us believe? As a western country ourselves - presuming, of course, that you are reading this from the US or some European country - we do not consider other nations to have much value in comparison to our own. Because we have created a Eurocentric view of what society should be, we have disallowed other countries to feel that their own culture is worth portraying in novels or media. For example, most people are lead to believe that Africa is riddled with disease, famine, and "uneducated" people who are in dire need of help. This just isn't true! There are places ...