Skip to main content

The Duality of Freedom in V For Vendetta

Graphic novels carry the honor of being the most deceptively collaborative medium. Films and traditional novels each have their own strengths, demanding different levels of participation from their audience and building on their limitations therewithin, but no other medium can show so much to their audience and still build from how little they can show. Comics, by their very concept, trick a reader into seeing motion where there is none. They hear words that are never spoken, see people in paint and pen strokes, and build entire worlds from a series of small and uniform boxes. A comic is limited by how little page space an author can afford, but can it truly be said that their message stops at their artwork? Moviegoers build from what they see. Novels live and die by the depth of a reader's imagination. But graphic novels demand attention from both sides, and rather than buckle under the limitations of each medium, they use text and artwork as stepping stones to form something entirely new.

V For Vendetta, much like the medium of graphic novels itself, thrives on duality. The dystopian London setting pits two political extremes against each other: the fascists headed by the Nazi-inspired Norsefire, and the anarchy spearheaded by the mysterious titular V. Curiously, V is presented in a morally ambiguous light despite having all the makings of a classic comic book hero. He fights for what he believes in, seeks to free the people from a totalitarian state, and is given superhuman powers after becoming a human test subject. However, he is also a violent terrorist willing to put innocents in harm's way, going so far as to kidnap and torture Evey to make her understand his mindset. The subverted archetypes also extend to many members of Norsefire, from the heroic antagonist Eric Finch to the outright pathetic Adam Susan--a far cry from the usual cruel and charismatic comic book dictator. Most importantly of all, the theme of duality extends to anarchy itself. Consider the following page:

Source: Moore, Alan and David Lloyd. V For Vendetta. DC Comics, 2008.

V's calm and collected speech contrasts sharply against the violence of the Norsefire soldiers. Even more, V's words carry a threat, spoken against a backdrop of human atrocities. In any other medium, this juxtaposition would not work. The text works against the images by forcing the reader to consider the contrast in each side. If we can briefly apply some of the concepts raised by Scott McCloud in his book Understanding Comics, we see that this medium, this collaborative experience, demands more from the reader than a film ever could. Which side is wrong? Which side is right? Are both? Are neither? If the medium is the message, as argued by McCloud, then V For Vendetta forces the reader to confront all sides of oppression, even if it comes from within.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Analysis of Aya: Life in Yop City

To begin this week's post, I'd like to first address a few things about the author's duty to his/her readers. When we think of reading material from other countries or cultures, what factors are important to us? What information do we need in order to recognize the significance of the author's work? For me, it's important for the author to find some way to connect to me as a reader. Do we share a common experience? Can I relate your story to mine? This is not to say that a writer's work is rendered unimpressive if they choose not to do this. But I do think it goes without saying that most impressionable works hit us emotionally. I also think that an author should be conscious of the world that they are painting for the reader. Is it true what you're writing? Does it provide some sort of insight into the world as you see it? Are you confirming outside opinions of your culture, or are you breaking the stereotypes that have been placed upon you? That being sai...

Junji Ito and the Art of the Uncanny

As discussed in Chapter 2 of Scott McCloud's Understanding Comics , the Japanese style of comic book art holds several notable quirks. While early manga artists tended to favor simplistic, yet distinct styles that paved the way for a number of internationally renowned characters, contemporary manga artists have since favored a hybrid style that juxtaposes the cutesy, rounded characters of yesteryear with the realistic and richly shaded settings that have since become popular. Building on this, McCloud describes a phenomenon in which Japanese comic artists have used realism to objectify--that is, to emphasize the "otherness" of certain characters, objects, or places--elements of their work and further separate these elements from the reader. I have chosen the work of one of my favorite comic artists, Japanese horror icon Junji Ito, to further illustrate McCloud's point. Though McCloud describes this phenomenon in the context of Japanese comic book art, he is usi...

The Two Faces of Anarchy in V for Vendetta

As someone who has only seen the movie version of V for Vendetta once many years ago and have never read the graphic novel, I wasn’t exactly sure how similar or different the movie version would be to the graphic novel. I was in for a surprise when I discovered just how vastly different, they are from each other. With that being said, they do have some similarities when strictly looking at the motives of the characters. Let’s dive into those motives and how the author and illustrator of V for Vendetta achieved getting these motives across to their readers. In Scott McCloud’s chapter of Understanding Comics “ Blood in the Gutter ” we are presented with different panel – to – panel transitions, and an introduction to the term “gutter” as being the white space between the panels which is where the audience of reader “takes two separate images and transforms them into a single idea” (McCloud, 66). After finishing reading V for Vendetta , several themes or ideas that were most prevalent...