Skip to main content

The Duality of Freedom in V For Vendetta

Graphic novels carry the honor of being the most deceptively collaborative medium. Films and traditional novels each have their own strengths, demanding different levels of participation from their audience and building on their limitations therewithin, but no other medium can show so much to their audience and still build from how little they can show. Comics, by their very concept, trick a reader into seeing motion where there is none. They hear words that are never spoken, see people in paint and pen strokes, and build entire worlds from a series of small and uniform boxes. A comic is limited by how little page space an author can afford, but can it truly be said that their message stops at their artwork? Moviegoers build from what they see. Novels live and die by the depth of a reader's imagination. But graphic novels demand attention from both sides, and rather than buckle under the limitations of each medium, they use text and artwork as stepping stones to form something entirely new.

V For Vendetta, much like the medium of graphic novels itself, thrives on duality. The dystopian London setting pits two political extremes against each other: the fascists headed by the Nazi-inspired Norsefire, and the anarchy spearheaded by the mysterious titular V. Curiously, V is presented in a morally ambiguous light despite having all the makings of a classic comic book hero. He fights for what he believes in, seeks to free the people from a totalitarian state, and is given superhuman powers after becoming a human test subject. However, he is also a violent terrorist willing to put innocents in harm's way, going so far as to kidnap and torture Evey to make her understand his mindset. The subverted archetypes also extend to many members of Norsefire, from the heroic antagonist Eric Finch to the outright pathetic Adam Susan--a far cry from the usual cruel and charismatic comic book dictator. Most importantly of all, the theme of duality extends to anarchy itself. Consider the following page:

Source: Moore, Alan and David Lloyd. V For Vendetta. DC Comics, 2008.

V's calm and collected speech contrasts sharply against the violence of the Norsefire soldiers. Even more, V's words carry a threat, spoken against a backdrop of human atrocities. In any other medium, this juxtaposition would not work. The text works against the images by forcing the reader to consider the contrast in each side. If we can briefly apply some of the concepts raised by Scott McCloud in his book Understanding Comics, we see that this medium, this collaborative experience, demands more from the reader than a film ever could. Which side is wrong? Which side is right? Are both? Are neither? If the medium is the message, as argued by McCloud, then V For Vendetta forces the reader to confront all sides of oppression, even if it comes from within.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Iconic Abstraction and the Vocabulary of Comics in Hellboy

In Chapter 2 of Understanding Comics , McCloud talks about two key concepts I’d like to discuss: he identifies reality , language , and the picture plane as a representation of the pictorial vocabulary of comics, and he expresses a scale for iconic abstraction of comic art. As readers following the action in comics, we are guided by what objects and events cartoonists decide demand focus in each individual moment or panel. This focus via simplification of reality - referred to as abstraction - provides a rhythm of reading the visual representation of a sequence of events, controlling the timing of action and dialogue through spacing of panels and objects on a page. McCloud makes it clear that abstraction in comics is really just about the representation of ideas . Conceptually, we can perceive a specific drawn event, such as an explosion or a fight, without that event being pictured exactly or photorealistically. Rubble or glass flying midair can represent the impact of fights depi...

Sketching Reality in Art Spiegelman's Maus

It's no secret that novels often blur the line between reality and fiction. Whether influenced by an author's experiences or drawn from them wholesale, all forms of artwork will always carry a piece of their artist. This is no less true for graphic novels, a medium often stereotyped by traditional capes-and-crusaders-style storytelling. Whether or not this stigma is deserved is an argument for another day, but for now we will venture into a lesser-known genre not typically associated with the great literature classics: the non-fiction graphic novel. You may ask yourself if this is a misnomer. By their very definitions, non-fiction and novels are considered their own distinct categories. A novel, per tradition, is considered inherently fictitious, and regardless of whether or not you think fiction and non-fiction should be regarded on the same level, I will circle back around to my initial argument that art will always be influenced by the experiences of its author, and th...

The Two Faces of Anarchy in V for Vendetta

As someone who has only seen the movie version of V for Vendetta once many years ago and have never read the graphic novel, I wasn’t exactly sure how similar or different the movie version would be to the graphic novel. I was in for a surprise when I discovered just how vastly different, they are from each other. With that being said, they do have some similarities when strictly looking at the motives of the characters. Let’s dive into those motives and how the author and illustrator of V for Vendetta achieved getting these motives across to their readers. In Scott McCloud’s chapter of Understanding Comics “ Blood in the Gutter ” we are presented with different panel – to – panel transitions, and an introduction to the term “gutter” as being the white space between the panels which is where the audience of reader “takes two separate images and transforms them into a single idea” (McCloud, 66). After finishing reading V for Vendetta , several themes or ideas that were most prevalent...