Skip to main content

Is the Term Non-Fiction Graphic Novel a Misnomer?

The term non-fiction graphic novel is not a misnomer because a misnomer is an inaccurate use of a term or phrase. In my opinion the term non-fiction graphic novel is a perfect term to fit books like Maus and Contract With God because you can have a real life story and portray it in a medium that does not rely solely on text. Paintings are much like this because they are not a picture capturing the image nor a non-fiction piece of writing about the topic, but instead portray what happened using paint, a canvas, and the artist's imagination. It is pretty easy for something to be non-fiction and a novel because all you have to do is take the non-fiction story and add a creative twist to the way you tell the audience. Assigning simplistic images to a non-fiction story does not all of the sudden make it fiction, but it instead creates a way for the audience to relate to the protagonist or even antagonist in a way that they might not have been able to before. For example, in Understanding Comics, McCloud says that we as humans have the need to assign an emotion to everything we come in contact with, but it has to be a simple enough object in order to do that, otherwise it becomes "other". We do not see the details in our own faces so in order to put ourselves in the other's place, we need a medium with less detail like a comic. The way Spiegelman uses comics to portray his story is revolutionary because he decides to use animals as the main persona instead of people because it is easier to digest the seriousness of the novel. In other forms such as a written novel, yes he could have still used animals as the characters, but we as people would transform them in our minds into too-similar-to-human characters and the story would not be as easily well disposed.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Analysis of Aya: Life in Yop City

To begin this week's post, I'd like to first address a few things about the author's duty to his/her readers. When we think of reading material from other countries or cultures, what factors are important to us? What information do we need in order to recognize the significance of the author's work? For me, it's important for the author to find some way to connect to me as a reader. Do we share a common experience? Can I relate your story to mine? This is not to say that a writer's work is rendered unimpressive if they choose not to do this. But I do think it goes without saying that most impressionable works hit us emotionally. I also think that an author should be conscious of the world that they are painting for the reader. Is it true what you're writing? Does it provide some sort of insight into the world as you see it? Are you confirming outside opinions of your culture, or are you breaking the stereotypes that have been placed upon you? That being sai...

Junji Ito and the Art of the Uncanny

As discussed in Chapter 2 of Scott McCloud's Understanding Comics , the Japanese style of comic book art holds several notable quirks. While early manga artists tended to favor simplistic, yet distinct styles that paved the way for a number of internationally renowned characters, contemporary manga artists have since favored a hybrid style that juxtaposes the cutesy, rounded characters of yesteryear with the realistic and richly shaded settings that have since become popular. Building on this, McCloud describes a phenomenon in which Japanese comic artists have used realism to objectify--that is, to emphasize the "otherness" of certain characters, objects, or places--elements of their work and further separate these elements from the reader. I have chosen the work of one of my favorite comic artists, Japanese horror icon Junji Ito, to further illustrate McCloud's point. Though McCloud describes this phenomenon in the context of Japanese comic book art, he is usi...

Bringing Africa into the Fold

The comic Aya: Life in Yop City does a fantastic job of illustrating a culture different from the more popular Western variety. For those reading this, have you ever considered Africa in any way that was not influenced by main stream media? No? Well me either. It is sad to say, but my view of Africa was just - more or less - a vast land of chaos and poverty. Why? Because is that not what the media would have us believe? As a western country ourselves - presuming, of course, that you are reading this from the US or some European country - we do not consider other nations to have much value in comparison to our own. Because we have created a Eurocentric view of what society should be, we have disallowed other countries to feel that their own culture is worth portraying in novels or media. For example, most people are lead to believe that Africa is riddled with disease, famine, and "uneducated" people who are in dire need of help. This just isn't true! There are places ...