Skip to main content

Freedom and Choices in V for Vendetta

I never read V for Vendetta before, but I did watch the movie (Natalie Portman is my girl crush, after all.) After reading through V for Vendetta, I can understand the difference between the movie and the graphic novel. Obviously, they have their differences: the movie is based in America in 2020 while the graphic novel is in England during 1997. However, they do have similarities with the overlying theme being freedom. For the most part, people assume that the theme is anarchy and radicalism, but you can't have those things without freedom or the lack of it. Since this post is about the graphic novel, I'll only be discussing it in the novel - but if you have only seen the movie, give the book a chance. You won't regret it.

This was first shown towards the very beginning of the graphic novel. V is showing Evey Hammond, the 16-year-old impressionable girl that V has saved, his secret lair filled with books, movies, and music that the government has attempted to destroy in order to fulfill their own agendas. She is overcome with all the culture that she is missing out on because she isn't given the choice to partake in it or not. The government has made that choice for her - and the rest of England. The following panel from V for Vendetta shows how the government has taken away the idea of choices and given their 'subjects' what they deem is appropriate for their consumption.

Image: Gallifreyan


This also ties into a theory from Scott McCloud's Understanding Comics. Throughout chapter 3 in McCloud's book, he discusses a theory that there is meaning in between the white blank parts of the panels. While artists do their best to depict everything going on visually in their stories, there's a lot to be said in what is not shown: "All I ask of you is a little faith -- -- and a world of imagination." (McCloud, 93.) With faith and imagination, the story comes alive; without it, there is no story to begin with. By using this theory, the world of V for Vendetta is applicable to anyone and everyone, in America and England alike. By using this theory, the theme of freedom is applicable to anyone and everyone.

With too much freedom, there is anarchy. This is shown in the graphic novel when the government is shut down and total and utter chaos comes out. With all the freedom, there's no one to govern them and the worst comes out. The end of V for Vendetta leaves a lot to be thought about, a lot to be questioned, and a lot of non-answers. With all the chaos and anarchy, is there such a thing as too much freedom? Should we have a leader to guide us in our freedom? Or would that leader end up as a governing symbol and end up just like a sort of government, ending up in the exact same predicament as before? With "a little faith -- -- and a world of imagination" (McCloud, 93) we are allowed to exist in this world and have the freedom to make these choices for ourselves.

Gallifreyan, and Gallifreyan♦Gallifreyan. “Does V Reference Stanislaw Lem's ‘His Master's Voice’, and If so, Why?” Literature Stack Exchange, 1 Aug. 1967, https://literature.stackexchange.com/questions/2122/does-v-reference-stanislaw-lems-his-masters-voice-and-if-so-why.
McCloud, Scott. The Invisible Art Understanding Comics. HarperCollins Publishers, 1994.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Two Faces of Anarchy in V for Vendetta

As someone who has only seen the movie version of V for Vendetta once many years ago and have never read the graphic novel, I wasn’t exactly sure how similar or different the movie version would be to the graphic novel. I was in for a surprise when I discovered just how vastly different, they are from each other. With that being said, they do have some similarities when strictly looking at the motives of the characters. Let’s dive into those motives and how the author and illustrator of V for Vendetta achieved getting these motives across to their readers. In Scott McCloud’s chapter of Understanding Comics “ Blood in the Gutter ” we are presented with different panel – to – panel transitions, and an introduction to the term “gutter” as being the white space between the panels which is where the audience of reader “takes two separate images and transforms them into a single idea” (McCloud, 66). After finishing reading V for Vendetta , several themes or ideas that were most prevalent...

Iconic Abstraction and the Vocabulary of Comics in Hellboy

In Chapter 2 of Understanding Comics , McCloud talks about two key concepts I’d like to discuss: he identifies reality , language , and the picture plane as a representation of the pictorial vocabulary of comics, and he expresses a scale for iconic abstraction of comic art. As readers following the action in comics, we are guided by what objects and events cartoonists decide demand focus in each individual moment or panel. This focus via simplification of reality - referred to as abstraction - provides a rhythm of reading the visual representation of a sequence of events, controlling the timing of action and dialogue through spacing of panels and objects on a page. McCloud makes it clear that abstraction in comics is really just about the representation of ideas . Conceptually, we can perceive a specific drawn event, such as an explosion or a fight, without that event being pictured exactly or photorealistically. Rubble or glass flying midair can represent the impact of fights depi...

Sketching Reality in Art Spiegelman's Maus

It's no secret that novels often blur the line between reality and fiction. Whether influenced by an author's experiences or drawn from them wholesale, all forms of artwork will always carry a piece of their artist. This is no less true for graphic novels, a medium often stereotyped by traditional capes-and-crusaders-style storytelling. Whether or not this stigma is deserved is an argument for another day, but for now we will venture into a lesser-known genre not typically associated with the great literature classics: the non-fiction graphic novel. You may ask yourself if this is a misnomer. By their very definitions, non-fiction and novels are considered their own distinct categories. A novel, per tradition, is considered inherently fictitious, and regardless of whether or not you think fiction and non-fiction should be regarded on the same level, I will circle back around to my initial argument that art will always be influenced by the experiences of its author, and th...