Skip to main content

The Two Faces of Anarchy in V for Vendetta

As someone who has only seen the movie version of V for Vendetta once many years ago and have never read the graphic novel, I wasn’t exactly sure how similar or different the movie version would be to the graphic novel. I was in for a surprise when I discovered just how vastly different, they are from each other. With that being said, they do have some similarities when strictly looking at the motives of the characters. Let’s dive into those motives and how the author and illustrator of V for Vendetta achieved getting these motives across to their readers.
In Scott McCloud’s chapter of Understanding Comics “Blood in the Gutterwe are presented with different panel – to – panel transitions, and an introduction to the term “gutter” as being the white space between the panels which is where the audience of reader “takes two separate images and transforms them into a single idea” (McCloud, 66). After finishing reading V for Vendetta, several themes or ideas that were most prevalent is that of justice, freedom, one’s integrity, and how identity ties into these ideas overall. The novel conveys these themes to us by the acts of anarchy against the fascist government that has taken over England. The whole reason behind V’s acts is because he was once a prisoner in a resettlement camp and was tortured for years. Once V obtained his freedom, he set about obtaining it for the rest of the country and serving justice to those that had oppressed him and England for so long.
The question that is asked throughout the novel is “Who is behind the mask?”  But what we as readers learn throughout the novel however is that it doesn’t really matter who is behind the mask, and we also learn that (spoiler alert) it changes, and in hindsight we should have seen it coming. The opening panels of the novel foreshadow the events to come in the novel by doing just what McCloud talks about, by using scene – to – scene transitions and juxtaposing Evey and V in almost identical scenarios, both are getting ready for something, in front of a mirror, and both of them wearing a type of mask. In the end, it ends up being Evey behind the Guy Fawkes mask, because it doesn’t matter who is behind the mask, because the mask is a symbol for the acts that are being done. Something that V says sticks out to me in this instance, which is in Book 3 when he says “Anarchy wears two faces, both creator and destroyer. Thus destroyers topple empires, make a canvas of clean rubble where creators then can build a better world” (Moore, 248) This also ties in with the closure aspect the McCloud mentions in Chapter 3 of Understanding Comics, as readers we are, in that moment, meant to draw our own conclusion that V was the destroyer, and Evey is the creator who comes in to help create a better world to live in.

https://archive.org/details/VForVendettaComics/page/n3



McCloud, Scott. The Invisible Art Understanding Comics. HarperCollins Publishers, 1994.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is Maus a Non-Fiction Graphic Novel?

Art Spiegelman’s Maus is considered to be a non-fiction graphic novel, but is creating a graphic novel based off a true story even allowed? Maybe you thought graphic novels were meant to be fiction. Well, I think the form of a graphic novel should not be restricted to only fiction. It is known for graphic novels to be fiction rather than non-fiction because that is what a novel is, fiction, but the name shouldn’t be a limitation of what can and cannot be told though this medium. There are many reasons for why telling a non-fiction story through the form of a graphic novel is beneficial. Spiegelman was able to share the story of his father’s holocaust experience by creating a graphic novel of it, and from the looks of it, it’s been very successful. Telling a story through the form of a graphic novel allows the creator to deliver it in a unique way. We are able to understand the plot because of the language that is used along with the accompanying panels. In Maus , Spiegelman writes e...

Junji Ito and the Art of the Uncanny

As discussed in Chapter 2 of Scott McCloud's Understanding Comics , the Japanese style of comic book art holds several notable quirks. While early manga artists tended to favor simplistic, yet distinct styles that paved the way for a number of internationally renowned characters, contemporary manga artists have since favored a hybrid style that juxtaposes the cutesy, rounded characters of yesteryear with the realistic and richly shaded settings that have since become popular. Building on this, McCloud describes a phenomenon in which Japanese comic artists have used realism to objectify--that is, to emphasize the "otherness" of certain characters, objects, or places--elements of their work and further separate these elements from the reader. I have chosen the work of one of my favorite comic artists, Japanese horror icon Junji Ito, to further illustrate McCloud's point. Though McCloud describes this phenomenon in the context of Japanese comic book art, he is usi...

Walking Through Fire: "Sita's Ramayana"

Ramayana stands among India's oldest epic poems, one of the two surviving stories dating as far back as the seventh century B.C. Unfortunately, its protagonist has not stood the test of time. The poem tells the story of Rama, an exiled prince whose wife, Sita, chooses to accompany him despite not facing the same punishment. When Sita is kidnapped, Rama rescues her more out of a sense of obligation than love, ultimately questioning his wife's virtue and casting her away through no fault of her own. Rama is upheld as the ideal man, husband, and king throughout his tale. Samhita Arni, the author of Sita's Ramayana , clearly thinks otherwise. Sita's Ramayana , as one might suspect, is a graphic novel retelling of the epic poem shared from Sita's point of view. The original poem leaves little room for the exploration of her character, treating her more as a blank slate meant to represent the ideal wife of the time. She merely exists to shape her husband's characte...