Skip to main content

What we are shown…? Pyongyang

Hello everyone. Today I read rather interesting graphic novel called “Pyongyang: a journey in North Korea” by Guy Delisle, the Canadian cartoonist and animator. The story is about his time in North Korea as an animator.

While we've all heard horror stories about North Korea, footage is rare and hard to come by, so it's hard to get an accurate depiction of what it's really like there. By coincidence a while back I watch the documentary on North Korea that contain footage of a kind of tour guide walkthrough of parts of North Korea. So I can say with all certainty that this graphic novel seems to capture the exact same experience. One of the big things in common this novel has with the documentary, was that they only get to see what the North Korean government would allow them to see. One of the things that seems to always be on the tour in both the documentary and this graphic novel, is the giant statue of the “great leader” as seen in this page.

 


The novel depicts North Korea as a country under constant surveillance. However, the surveillance aspect is not overly noticeable as their guides tend to go ahead of them and there doesn't seem to be an overwhelming military presence as one might expect to see. It is clear from this panel they are nervous about not checking in with the proper authorities before going somewhere.



What the imagery and story tells us about North Korea is that it is a very restricted country, and that is likely everything the non Korean characters are experiencing is staged in some way. At least it feels that way. This panel seems to support that assumption.

 


Something interesting, is the way this panel was framed as well. I noticed this artist has a habit of both showing in picture and explaining in text in order to clarify the images meaning. This was fine most of the time, as I felt some scenes needed explanation. However, every once in a while you would come across scenes that were clearly self-explanatory and yet the author decided to add text anyway. One example would be these panels with the extremely long escalator and the man sitting on it.

 




Personally, I felt the same scene could have worked with or without word boxes for those two panels. The author does a very good job of combining words with pictures most of the time. Ovne of my favorite set of panels is the Korean water lady. He uses a set of moment-to-moment panels to show her creeping into the room to replace water.

One of the great things about using comics tell your story from a journalistic standpoint, is that visual images can convey far more information at a time than written words. This can become complicated however because sometimes pictures do not always convey information accurately without context. Context isn't always an explanation, sometimes it's little details that an artist can miss that a photograph would not. Another thing that can complicate graphic novels as legitimate journalism, is that we have to go by the artists word. An artist can use words and pictures to give as context, however in many ways it falls behind things like film in photography in that they carry a certain weight to their veracity. Because of this people may be less inclined to believe the story the graphic novel is trying to tell.

Another thing to think about is that people aren't always good at reading the context a pictures even when text is included. I was recently reading a Hawkeye comic where a man was confused at the airport about why there were alligators symbols. The symbol was actually supposed to mean a runway with an airplane touching down on it, but the way it was composed made it look like an alligator. So the artist must be careful how they depict words and images together. Not that journalists who use photographs and film who use photographs in film don’t have to be careful of the same thing, but the comic artist has to go the extra mile because it is a artistic media. This may be changing soon though, because of programs like Photoshop that allow pictures that were once thought of as solid evidence to be manipulated and even outright faked. It is kind of like the turn that Scott McCloud mentioned when he found it intriguing that just as arts and the written word began to shift, we ended up with the media of comics. In this way journalistic comics may gain greater veracity do to the fact that if you can't trust a picture from a camera anymore, how is it any different from a drawn comic. You would still have to take it's creator at words value, because of the public losing faith in a media they thought was as good as absolute proof only a few decades earlier.

Well that's all I have for now, thank you and have a nice day.

And if you’re interested in reading Pyongyang: A Journey in North Korea then I'll leave the link below to where it can be purchased.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Iconic Abstraction and the Vocabulary of Comics in Hellboy

In Chapter 2 of Understanding Comics , McCloud talks about two key concepts I’d like to discuss: he identifies reality , language , and the picture plane as a representation of the pictorial vocabulary of comics, and he expresses a scale for iconic abstraction of comic art. As readers following the action in comics, we are guided by what objects and events cartoonists decide demand focus in each individual moment or panel. This focus via simplification of reality - referred to as abstraction - provides a rhythm of reading the visual representation of a sequence of events, controlling the timing of action and dialogue through spacing of panels and objects on a page. McCloud makes it clear that abstraction in comics is really just about the representation of ideas . Conceptually, we can perceive a specific drawn event, such as an explosion or a fight, without that event being pictured exactly or photorealistically. Rubble or glass flying midair can represent the impact of fights depi...

Our world: Anyone can make a change

Are you a social activist? Do you do your part to make the world a better place? Even small acts can make a difference. First, I’d like to point out that a social activist is someone that takes a stand, someone who campaigns for a social change, an advocate that stands for what is right, it is someone who promotes environmental, social, political, and economic reforms to make that change in society. Now that I have defined it, let me explain some acts of social activism. Volunteering at any local shelters, whether it be for babies, kids, adults, and even to help to care for animals, your time makes a difference. You’d be amazed at how rewarding it is for yourself, as well as giving than receiving will make a whole positive change to your persona. Another example of social activism is going green. Recycling papers, boxes, and plastics, makes a whole positive change into saving our earth, as well as saving the ocean alongside the animal’s habitats, and stopping global warming. ...

Is Maus a Non-Fiction Graphic Novel?

Art Spiegelman’s Maus is considered to be a non-fiction graphic novel, but is creating a graphic novel based off a true story even allowed? Maybe you thought graphic novels were meant to be fiction. Well, I think the form of a graphic novel should not be restricted to only fiction. It is known for graphic novels to be fiction rather than non-fiction because that is what a novel is, fiction, but the name shouldn’t be a limitation of what can and cannot be told though this medium. There are many reasons for why telling a non-fiction story through the form of a graphic novel is beneficial. Spiegelman was able to share the story of his father’s holocaust experience by creating a graphic novel of it, and from the looks of it, it’s been very successful. Telling a story through the form of a graphic novel allows the creator to deliver it in a unique way. We are able to understand the plot because of the language that is used along with the accompanying panels. In Maus , Spiegelman writes e...