Skip to main content

Some Symbols Just Aren't For You

By

When I think of comic books, I think of superheroes in skin-tight colorful suits flinging punches and sending bad guys to jail. I don't think of heavy black and white emotional tales packed with vulnerability and fear. Of course, I've been raised in the United States where the words "graphic novel" are practically interchangeable with Superman.

I recently started reading Persepolis, a drawn memoir by Marjane Satrapi that explores her experiences growing up in the Islamic Revolution. It's completely different than what I'm used to. I don't just mean the style though. It's everything. It's the symbols. It's the references. it's the subject matter. It's the language. It's all of it. It's all different from what I'm used to as a white American reader.

A lot of traditional American comics are more concerned with what comic scholar Scott McCloud calls pictorial representation. Think of how you know Superman is a big muscular dude cause he looks like a big muscular dude. Satrapi's art isn't so based on pictorial representation but rather iconic images that act as symbols. For instance, the faces Satrapi draws are little more than ovals with an "L" shaped line for the nose, a thin line (or black circle) for the mouth and circles with colored in circles inside of them for eyes. There's little to no detail most of the time. The bodies look pretty similar with the only major difference being the gendering of women and men done by thining women's waists and adding breasts. Eventually, most of the women are placed in a veil which further eliminates details that did make them look like individuals.

The difficult thing, however, is that the symbols in Satrapi's memoir are not always accessible for me because I come from such a different culture. Take for instance that veil. To me, it could be a headcovering or maybe a haircut. It was not super clear at first, but the story explained it to me. Someone who has lived in Iran or been involved with Islam would have more immediately identified the veil for what it is.

I was able to identify some of the symbols like the nose and eyes I mentioned a moment ago. I was also able to identify other small things like tears or cars. These were all things I had seen drawn before. Things I am used to seeing in my everyday life. However, things associated with Isalm, were more difficult for me to understand much less identify the importance of. Things like certain guns, the thick full-faced beards of some men, and the Shah. I was able to understand the story, but there were certain parts that I didn't fully grasp at first. I'm still not sure I fully grasp them. They are symbols that  are not meant for me. They're meant for those who are a part of the same community as Satrapi.

McCloud theorizes that we tell stories in graphic novels through symbols. To understand these symbols, we have to have the background information to do so. We have to be able to make that connection between the symbol and what it's symbolizing. However, if you don't have any knowledge of what the symbol is symbolizing, you're out of luck.

This made me think a lot about what I do and don't know. I'm used to reading books in which I know all of the symbols and can easily identify what they need. The more I read literature from other countries, the more I realize how many things I do not understand and the more I want to learn. Persepolis only shows me one story. I can't wait to read more and learn more. I hope in the next multicultural graphic novel I read, I understand more symbols.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Iconic Abstraction and the Vocabulary of Comics in Hellboy

By Anonymous
In Chapter 2 of Understanding Comics , McCloud talks about two key concepts I’d like to discuss: he identifies reality , language , and the picture plane as a representation of the pictorial vocabulary of comics, and he expresses a scale for iconic abstraction of comic art. As readers following the action in comics, we are guided by what objects and events cartoonists decide demand focus in each individual moment or panel. This focus via simplification of reality - referred to as abstraction - provides a rhythm of reading the visual representation of a sequence of events, controlling the timing of action and dialogue through spacing of panels and objects on a page. McCloud makes it clear that abstraction in comics is really just about the representation of ideas . Conceptually, we can perceive a specific drawn event, such as an explosion or a fight, without that event being pictured exactly or photorealistically. Rubble or glass flying midair can represent the impact of fights depi...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Two Faces of Anarchy in V for Vendetta

By Anonymous
As someone who has only seen the movie version of V for Vendetta once many years ago and have never read the graphic novel, I wasn’t exactly sure how similar or different the movie version would be to the graphic novel. I was in for a surprise when I discovered just how vastly different, they are from each other. With that being said, they do have some similarities when strictly looking at the motives of the characters. Let’s dive into those motives and how the author and illustrator of V for Vendetta achieved getting these motives across to their readers. In Scott McCloud’s chapter of Understanding Comics “ Blood in the Gutter ” we are presented with different panel – to – panel transitions, and an introduction to the term “gutter” as being the white space between the panels which is where the audience of reader “takes two separate images and transforms them into a single idea” (McCloud, 66). After finishing reading V for Vendetta , several themes or ideas that were most prevalent...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sketching Reality in Art Spiegelman's Maus

By Anonymous
It's no secret that novels often blur the line between reality and fiction. Whether influenced by an author's experiences or drawn from them wholesale, all forms of artwork will always carry a piece of their artist. This is no less true for graphic novels, a medium often stereotyped by traditional capes-and-crusaders-style storytelling. Whether or not this stigma is deserved is an argument for another day, but for now we will venture into a lesser-known genre not typically associated with the great literature classics: the non-fiction graphic novel. You may ask yourself if this is a misnomer. By their very definitions, non-fiction and novels are considered their own distinct categories. A novel, per tradition, is considered inherently fictitious, and regardless of whether or not you think fiction and non-fiction should be regarded on the same level, I will circle back around to my initial argument that art will always be influenced by the experiences of its author, and th...
Post a Comment
Read more