Skip to main content

Gender Roles in Sita's Ramayana

First looking at the title of Sita's Ramayana on the syllabus, I was confused. Both of the words were brand new for me. Taking this class has really opened me up to new everything - new cultures, new words, new worlds. However, this one really confused me - Sita was probably a name but what was Ramayana? I did what any millennial/Gen-Z/whatever-they're-calling-my-generation-now scholar would do: I turned to Google.

The Ramayana is an epic poem depicting Prince Rama trying to save his wife Sita from Rava, who has ten heads and twenty arms. It's very important in Indian culture since it was written in Sanskrit and it teaches ancient Hindu teachings. After learning all this, the title made more sense. Instead of her being an object to fight over and rescue, what would it be like through Sita's eyes? The story was her's, yet it was rarely ever discussed her version of events or how it felt to have a war fought over her.

Reading Sita's Ramayana was extremely eye-opening for me. It was like no other graphic novel that I had read before. The drawing style was very similar to the authentic style used when the Ramayana was first written. Bright colors, bold colors of skin, culturally appropriate clothes - everything visually was stunning. The text is either in a speech bubble in a long-drawn bubble out of the frame or in a stand-alone box with dashed lines surrounding it. 
Image result for sita's ramayana
Scott McCloud's Understanding Comics is a graphic novel about graphic novels - a textbook of the history and concepts of graphic novels in the form of graphic novels. In his work, McCloud discusses the importance of frame and the negative spaces used between frames and how that gives a sense of time. In the passage I want to discuss, the frame above shows how sudden everything is happening. There's no white space with room for time to pass. Everything happens so quickly, there's no time or room for anything else to happen.

I also chose this passage because of the way the text is written. Normally, in the original Ramayana, the viewpoint is through the men's eyes - Rava and Rama, namely. Throughout Sita's Ramayana, Sita is obviously the main character and the events are told in her perspective. What really intrigues me about this passage in particular though is when the text goes from normal lower-case lettering to it being entirely in capital letters. It shows her distress and emotional turmoil as she waits to see what will happen next.

Using the visual and textual concepts that Sita's Ramayana gives us, I think that it leaves the reader feeling a type of sorrow for all that Sita is lacking - a voice to stop this war, a choice to be an object or not, a main character in a story that is about her. At least, that's what I took away from it. Because Sita is a woman (in ancient Indian culture), she has no rights to her own life and how it played out. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Analysis of Aya: Life in Yop City

To begin this week's post, I'd like to first address a few things about the author's duty to his/her readers. When we think of reading material from other countries or cultures, what factors are important to us? What information do we need in order to recognize the significance of the author's work? For me, it's important for the author to find some way to connect to me as a reader. Do we share a common experience? Can I relate your story to mine? This is not to say that a writer's work is rendered unimpressive if they choose not to do this. But I do think it goes without saying that most impressionable works hit us emotionally. I also think that an author should be conscious of the world that they are painting for the reader. Is it true what you're writing? Does it provide some sort of insight into the world as you see it? Are you confirming outside opinions of your culture, or are you breaking the stereotypes that have been placed upon you? That being sai...

Junji Ito and the Art of the Uncanny

As discussed in Chapter 2 of Scott McCloud's Understanding Comics , the Japanese style of comic book art holds several notable quirks. While early manga artists tended to favor simplistic, yet distinct styles that paved the way for a number of internationally renowned characters, contemporary manga artists have since favored a hybrid style that juxtaposes the cutesy, rounded characters of yesteryear with the realistic and richly shaded settings that have since become popular. Building on this, McCloud describes a phenomenon in which Japanese comic artists have used realism to objectify--that is, to emphasize the "otherness" of certain characters, objects, or places--elements of their work and further separate these elements from the reader. I have chosen the work of one of my favorite comic artists, Japanese horror icon Junji Ito, to further illustrate McCloud's point. Though McCloud describes this phenomenon in the context of Japanese comic book art, he is usi...

The Two Faces of Anarchy in V for Vendetta

As someone who has only seen the movie version of V for Vendetta once many years ago and have never read the graphic novel, I wasn’t exactly sure how similar or different the movie version would be to the graphic novel. I was in for a surprise when I discovered just how vastly different, they are from each other. With that being said, they do have some similarities when strictly looking at the motives of the characters. Let’s dive into those motives and how the author and illustrator of V for Vendetta achieved getting these motives across to their readers. In Scott McCloud’s chapter of Understanding Comics “ Blood in the Gutter ” we are presented with different panel – to – panel transitions, and an introduction to the term “gutter” as being the white space between the panels which is where the audience of reader “takes two separate images and transforms them into a single idea” (McCloud, 66). After finishing reading V for Vendetta , several themes or ideas that were most prevalent...