Skip to main content

ECOCIDE?!?!?! The Reality of Climate Delusion!


As the World Burns is a classic example of a tool for social activism. It is written by climate activist to promote a “climate” agenda.  So, what exactly is climate change? Unfortunately, that depends on who you are talking to and what their agenda is.  Before I continue, I want to clear the air, I am not a planet hating, destroy the world, climate change denier. I am a realist, who does my own research on the topic rather than losing my head amid the “Armageddon” fear mongering, holy cow we’re all going to die in 10 years rhetoric. So, reading this book, for me, was an “eyerolling” endeavor because of the research I have done and life that I have lived. Disclaimer done, now moving on to the book!
Extraterrestrial planet eating robots whose goals are to kill or eat everything on the planet, “Big bad corporations” of America ( who according to the book are implied to be the ones eating the planet themselves), two little girls, one who is a bit more conservative in her approach than the other,  fighting against these horrible planet killing monsters, and a one eyed bunny (labeled a terrorist) are all main characters in this book.  The book begins with these two little girls talking between themselves and trying to figure out how to fight against those who are destroying the planet (be they humans or aliens).  There is a bigger picture here than just a “graphic novel”. Many graphic novels have a point, but this one has a point and an agenda with it. As you can probably guess this is an activist book, whose topic is climate change and pushing that agenda.  Using typical graphic novel features this book sets out to “shed light” on the topic of climate change, disaster, whatever you want to call it.  One encounter that I found interesting in the book was the one between, I guess you would call him a “modern day” hippie and a fox. During the exchange the man admonishes the fox for being a meat eater.  He tells the fox how disrespectful and cruel it is. The fox’s response is a jab at the hippie as the fox reminds the man who it was that created “factory farming” and labs etc.… A jab at humans for their way of life I suppose.  In this exchange you can see in the picture below how the illustrator of the book uses the concept of lines, symbolism, and movement to attract the reader’s eye.  For the lines you can see in the last frame the man sitting on the stump of the tree and there are lines above his head representing his act of “meditation”  the symbolism is the trees being cut down, representing the destruction of the planet and movement is the fox moving from the last frame into the next.  Picture Below: 


Another frame I would like to highlight is below:  


In this frame the two girls are talking about the stats of recycling, cutting down on garbage, changing your light bulbs that you use, all the “energy reducing” things that people can do to reduce their “carbon footprint”.   For some reason this concept is attacked by the author throughout the book, as if they do not matter or can not help… in the opinion of the author of the book the only thing that would help is killing the corporations of the world, ( not smart if you ask me).  In these frames the authors lack of use of color is interesting.  I believe the decision to use black and white here are the authors attempt to create a mood of gloom. The author also using the sense of movement in these frames as the two girl’s foot position give the reader the sense that they are walking. In the last frame the use of the word bubble with the word “sigh” in it gives the reader an audio to hear in their minds. As you read you in your own minds sighs right along with her.  
NOW MOVING ON TO WHAT'S NEW? 
What’s new that you may not know? Here is some information about “climate” that most people do not know. Though I commend the younger generation for their efforts of being good stewards of the planet, which we should be, there are things that people my age and older have that they do not. Time, experience and history.  Most people in the younger generation, because they have not been around very long, fail to realize that ever so often the climate people climb out of their labs and try to throw some kind of climate catastrophes at the world to see if it will stick. Here are some examples:
·         In 1967 a Sandford biologist Paul Ehrlrich said the world would be in a longtime feminine that would peak by 1975…. Didn’t happen…
·         In the 1970’s these scientist predicted a new ice age by the 21st century depleting the rivers in the U.S and strangling the worlds oxygen… we were all supposed to be dead by the 1990… ummm yea, still here.
·         In 1978 there was a “no end in sight for the 30-year cooling trend. I remember watching a segment on this on the history channel hosted by Leonard Nimoy in 1979. They said we were all going to freeze to death…. Yea we’re not frozen either….
·         1989 prediction of rising sea level were going to obliterate the nation: NEWS FLASH the U.S. IS STILL HERE... no obliteration occurred.
·         Let us not forget the great acid rain scare of the 80’s. yea all of our skins were going to be burned off by acid rain…. Nope that didn’t happen either.
·         1990’s the dreaded wearing away of the ozone layer… we were all going to die of over exposure of the sun... it was later proven with study that every time there is a lightening storm the ozone repairs itself… soo yea that didn't happen either. 
·         2008 it was said that the Arctic would be free of all sea ice by 2018… hmmm well this is 2019 and the ice is still there, in fact it’s actually on the rise. 
·         2004 they predicted that Britain would have the same climate as Siberia by 2024…. The world awaits…. But that probably won’t happen either!
My point is this, these people are never correct! The earth is a living breathing creature, just like you and me…. And just like you and me she has seasons…. (there is a reason she is referred to as “mother” earth.) Does the earth change from time to time, yes but she knows what she is doing and is very resilient! Does that mean we don’t need to take care of her, no not at all, again we are supposed to be good stewards, but it also doesn’t mean when need to crush all of our cars, stop drilling for oil, and move into caves and live off of sea weed for the rest of our lives! Cows do not cause environmental travesties and neither do we… the dinosaurs are proof of that, they didn’t drive around in cars, build things,  have air conditioners or fly around in planes, yet you don’t see them walking around anymore…. The earth is going to do what she is going to do and no one on her surface can predict that or stop it. To believe that we are that powerful that we control what she does is arrogant.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Analysis of Aya: Life in Yop City

To begin this week's post, I'd like to first address a few things about the author's duty to his/her readers. When we think of reading material from other countries or cultures, what factors are important to us? What information do we need in order to recognize the significance of the author's work? For me, it's important for the author to find some way to connect to me as a reader. Do we share a common experience? Can I relate your story to mine? This is not to say that a writer's work is rendered unimpressive if they choose not to do this. But I do think it goes without saying that most impressionable works hit us emotionally. I also think that an author should be conscious of the world that they are painting for the reader. Is it true what you're writing? Does it provide some sort of insight into the world as you see it? Are you confirming outside opinions of your culture, or are you breaking the stereotypes that have been placed upon you? That being sai...

Junji Ito and the Art of the Uncanny

As discussed in Chapter 2 of Scott McCloud's Understanding Comics , the Japanese style of comic book art holds several notable quirks. While early manga artists tended to favor simplistic, yet distinct styles that paved the way for a number of internationally renowned characters, contemporary manga artists have since favored a hybrid style that juxtaposes the cutesy, rounded characters of yesteryear with the realistic and richly shaded settings that have since become popular. Building on this, McCloud describes a phenomenon in which Japanese comic artists have used realism to objectify--that is, to emphasize the "otherness" of certain characters, objects, or places--elements of their work and further separate these elements from the reader. I have chosen the work of one of my favorite comic artists, Japanese horror icon Junji Ito, to further illustrate McCloud's point. Though McCloud describes this phenomenon in the context of Japanese comic book art, he is usi...

The Two Faces of Anarchy in V for Vendetta

As someone who has only seen the movie version of V for Vendetta once many years ago and have never read the graphic novel, I wasn’t exactly sure how similar or different the movie version would be to the graphic novel. I was in for a surprise when I discovered just how vastly different, they are from each other. With that being said, they do have some similarities when strictly looking at the motives of the characters. Let’s dive into those motives and how the author and illustrator of V for Vendetta achieved getting these motives across to their readers. In Scott McCloud’s chapter of Understanding Comics “ Blood in the Gutter ” we are presented with different panel – to – panel transitions, and an introduction to the term “gutter” as being the white space between the panels which is where the audience of reader “takes two separate images and transforms them into a single idea” (McCloud, 66). After finishing reading V for Vendetta , several themes or ideas that were most prevalent...