Skip to main content


Comics, or “visual sequential art”, as Scott Mcloud puts it, has an intended purpose. Each frame of a comic changes, indicating motion, movement, and a change in time or scene. This can be viewed in the above “Garfield” comic strip by Jim Davis. In the first frame, we see the character of John asking a question. The next two frames then show the excitement and energy generated from his imposed question. The scenes that directly follow then result in frustration as well as the eventual intended outcome from the initial question that was asked at the very beginning. If this were a stand-alone cartoon, there would be no sequencing or contrasted images to view the change in time, which later comes to a humorous concluding solution. The visual sequencing here, is what helps make this "Garfield" comic strip a true comic. With each new frame, we as an audience, can see the progression of the given scenario play out. 
Something else that I found rather interesting in Scott McCloud’s Understanding Comics is the concept of “amplification through simplification.” One’s ability to relate directly to a cartoon is typically through minimizing the way something or someone looks. If a person, scene, or object looks intricate or filled with great detail, it can sometimes create a sense of detachment and distance from what is that we are viewing. It is easier to relate to something or someone if we can picture ourselves in the situation. Cartooning is not just a way of illustrating, but is typically intentional to influence an audience. It is a way to help connect or disconnect, and will then influence the way we perceive something. 
If we observe the way that the “Garfield” comic strip is drawn, it is really rather modest and not overcomplicated. The house does not have an intensely patterned wallpaper or any true defining features that would make it feel out of the ordinary from a standard home. The animals do not look incredibly realistic, but have the basic features of a cat and dog with four legs and a tail. It is this kind of cartooning that makes us recognize this scenario as relatable and not far-off from everyday life. John, the owner of the cat and dog (Garfield and Odie) looks rather common too with his blue jeans and solid collared shirt. This is yet another example of how minimal cartooning helps determine the degree an audience can identify with the characters of this visual sequential art. Even if someone reading this comic is not a pet owner, the situation is not some far-fetched unrealistic development that could not happen in real life. It is the combination of both the sequencing and the simplistic cartooning that allows the audience to follow along and relate to “Garfield.”



“Garfield.” Fourth Garfield Treasury, by Jim Davis, Ballantine Books, 1987.

“Understanding Comics: Writing and Art.” Understanding Comics: Writing and Art, by Scott McCloud, Harper Perennial, 1994, pp. 1–59.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Iconic Abstraction and the Vocabulary of Comics in Hellboy

In Chapter 2 of Understanding Comics , McCloud talks about two key concepts I’d like to discuss: he identifies reality , language , and the picture plane as a representation of the pictorial vocabulary of comics, and he expresses a scale for iconic abstraction of comic art. As readers following the action in comics, we are guided by what objects and events cartoonists decide demand focus in each individual moment or panel. This focus via simplification of reality - referred to as abstraction - provides a rhythm of reading the visual representation of a sequence of events, controlling the timing of action and dialogue through spacing of panels and objects on a page. McCloud makes it clear that abstraction in comics is really just about the representation of ideas . Conceptually, we can perceive a specific drawn event, such as an explosion or a fight, without that event being pictured exactly or photorealistically. Rubble or glass flying midair can represent the impact of fights depi...

The Two Faces of Anarchy in V for Vendetta

As someone who has only seen the movie version of V for Vendetta once many years ago and have never read the graphic novel, I wasn’t exactly sure how similar or different the movie version would be to the graphic novel. I was in for a surprise when I discovered just how vastly different, they are from each other. With that being said, they do have some similarities when strictly looking at the motives of the characters. Let’s dive into those motives and how the author and illustrator of V for Vendetta achieved getting these motives across to their readers. In Scott McCloud’s chapter of Understanding Comics “ Blood in the Gutter ” we are presented with different panel – to – panel transitions, and an introduction to the term “gutter” as being the white space between the panels which is where the audience of reader “takes two separate images and transforms them into a single idea” (McCloud, 66). After finishing reading V for Vendetta , several themes or ideas that were most prevalent...

Sketching Reality in Art Spiegelman's Maus

It's no secret that novels often blur the line between reality and fiction. Whether influenced by an author's experiences or drawn from them wholesale, all forms of artwork will always carry a piece of their artist. This is no less true for graphic novels, a medium often stereotyped by traditional capes-and-crusaders-style storytelling. Whether or not this stigma is deserved is an argument for another day, but for now we will venture into a lesser-known genre not typically associated with the great literature classics: the non-fiction graphic novel. You may ask yourself if this is a misnomer. By their very definitions, non-fiction and novels are considered their own distinct categories. A novel, per tradition, is considered inherently fictitious, and regardless of whether or not you think fiction and non-fiction should be regarded on the same level, I will circle back around to my initial argument that art will always be influenced by the experiences of its author, and th...